<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best and Worst Brand Names of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pollywoginc.com/blog/2009/12/16/best-and-worst-brand-names-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pollywoginc.com/blog/2009/12/16/best-and-worst-brand-names-of-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Do abstract real words make the best brand names? - Semantic Argument</title>
		<link>http://pollywoginc.com/blog/2009/12/16/best-and-worst-brand-names-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Do abstract real words make the best brand names? - Semantic Argument</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollywoginc.com/blog/?p=351#comment-368</guid>
		<description>[...] for primarily English-speaking audiences (suppose I have to make that distinction now). Upon seeing Pollywog&#8217;s list of what they consider the best and worst names of 2009, I realized that most of the &#8220;best&#8221; names are real English words. In naming lingo, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for primarily English-speaking audiences (suppose I have to make that distinction now). Upon seeing Pollywog&#8217;s list of what they consider the best and worst names of 2009, I realized that most of the &#8220;best&#8221; names are real English words. In naming lingo, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon</title>
		<link>http://pollywoginc.com/blog/2009/12/16/best-and-worst-brand-names-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollywoginc.com/blog/?p=351#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Hi, Louis! I couldn&#039;t agree with you more. Naming is largely misunderstood and undervalued, especially by entrepreneurs and startups in a hurry to get to market, or unwilling to spend precious capital on something they believe they can create for nothing.

Mea culpa on Twitter... We&#039;ve had an account for months, but tend to be slackers when it comes to tweeting. I will try to do better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Louis! I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more. Naming is largely misunderstood and undervalued, especially by entrepreneurs and startups in a hurry to get to market, or unwilling to spend precious capital on something they believe they can create for nothing.</p>
<p>Mea culpa on Twitter&#8230; We&#8217;ve had an account for months, but tend to be slackers when it comes to tweeting. I will try to do better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Louna</title>
		<link>http://pollywoginc.com/blog/2009/12/16/best-and-worst-brand-names-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Louna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollywoginc.com/blog/?p=351#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Brand names are maybe the more important asset for a company. Great article and welcome to your new online presence via Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brand names are maybe the more important asset for a company. Great article and welcome to your new online presence via Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
