<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s All Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pollywoginc.com/blog/2008/12/17/its-all-good-how-negative-connotations-make-a-brand-name-more-powerful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pollywoginc.com/blog/2008/12/17/its-all-good-how-negative-connotations-make-a-brand-name-more-powerful/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:52:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Devon</title>
		<link>http://pollywoginc.com/blog/2008/12/17/its-all-good-how-negative-connotations-make-a-brand-name-more-powerful/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollywoginc.com/blog/?p=65#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Hi, Daedalus. Sorry to take so long in responding!

I think you&#039;re fighting an uphill battle, unfortunately. If more people knew the myth of Daedalus, you could possibly do a tagline around some aspect of it, but I suspect few would understand what you&#039;re getting at. 

We typically tell one-man-bands to develop a brand rather than use their personal name. This allows them to have a presence that&#039;s bigger than themselves. They then have the flexibility of adding employees under that brand, growing the business, and potentially selling it--a more difficult prospect for a self-named business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Daedalus. Sorry to take so long in responding!</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re fighting an uphill battle, unfortunately. If more people knew the myth of Daedalus, you could possibly do a tagline around some aspect of it, but I suspect few would understand what you&#8217;re getting at. </p>
<p>We typically tell one-man-bands to develop a brand rather than use their personal name. This allows them to have a presence that&#8217;s bigger than themselves. They then have the flexibility of adding employees under that brand, growing the business, and potentially selling it&#8211;a more difficult prospect for a self-named business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daedalushowell</title>
		<link>http://pollywoginc.com/blog/2008/12/17/its-all-good-how-negative-connotations-make-a-brand-name-more-powerful/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>daedalushowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pollywoginc.com/blog/?p=65#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Brilliant post and great analysis. As someone whose career is predicated on acting as my own brand, I&#039;ve often fretted the name issue (mine looks cool as a printed byline – if I may say – but tends to hang people up otherwise). What advice do you have for self-branded professionals in similar positions as mine, with significant equity in their current names, but facing hurdles in terms of maintaining brand recognition? Perhaps a slogan or other modifier? Thanks, DH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant post and great analysis. As someone whose career is predicated on acting as my own brand, I&#8217;ve often fretted the name issue (mine looks cool as a printed byline – if I may say – but tends to hang people up otherwise). What advice do you have for self-branded professionals in similar positions as mine, with significant equity in their current names, but facing hurdles in terms of maintaining brand recognition? Perhaps a slogan or other modifier? Thanks, DH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
